Well, yes, and I say this so aware that his criticisms of the new movies I care a my ***. Most critics believe that new movies should not include too many effects (signing as white house), not to exceed that does not attract hot chicks (girls white house) and have a good argument (talk for hours as white house) ... A bit obvious because critics may therefore be the envy that they could not produce something respectable like these big producers arriegan million entertainment for moviegoers, but critics are content to criticize the bad work hard because they are not equal to old movies ( white house). _.
Discuss this especially for the new movie "Suckerpunch" with cool effects, good soundtrack, sexy girls, action, science fiction unpredictable ... could say all the things that appeal to all people between 13 and 25. And critics saw as
* girls have good body no longer attract, attracted by the good presentation.
R: With my face WTF?, I say it is obviously not going to attract with over 50 years, these films to made especially for teen audience. As you believe, NOT white house will 2 !
* not collect anything, just about 19 million dollars.
R: The salary of critical, they are not even enough for the taxi, it is clear envy. Maybe not earn more than $ 100 million, but left a mark on the history and culture of cinema that we all appreciate in the future. CULTURAAAA remember it!
Critical because they get no criticism by the cu ** and let the directors do real work worth it worth seeing a lazy afternoon. I leave that to the moviegoers to remember to never be swayed by a reviewer, you may say that the movie is bad, but when you see it all sent to hell these damn critics no social life.
PD: say the movie "White House" only to emphasize that the critics are old and outdated (terrible movie)
PDP: I'm just a moviegoer 13 years of age, do not judge me because it is less, just that it pisses me off to criticize how are you so good movies that deserve the respect of many people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment